|
|
LIVESTOCK SECTOR IN
|
Livestock
sector plays a critical role in the welfare of
With an annual production of 74 million tonnes
in 1998-99,
Fig.1 :
Trend in milk production in

This has
implications on several fronts. First, the supply-demand scenario for different
products suggests that the demand for livestock products is income elastic and
is rising continuously. The demand side is expected to be upbeat as disposable
income witnesses sustained growth. Over the next two
decades, demand for livestock products is likely to grow faster. Demand for
meat and eggs would be adequately met from the domestic supplies if current
trends in production growth are sustained. Lack of productivity growth will
impact prices of different products. Real prices of most commodities are
expected to increase in excess of an average compound growth rate of five
percent.
Table 1 :
Yield levels and growth in outputs of livestock
|
Items |
Growth rate (%) |
Average yield (kg/animal annum ) |
|
|
1981-96 |
1992-93 |
||
|
|
World |
||
|
Milk |
4.7 |
1057 |
- |
|
Indigenous cattle |
- |
572 |
1993* |
|
Crossbred cattle |
- |
2051 |
- |
|
|
- |
1263 |
- |
|
Egg |
6.7 |
- |
- |
|
Desi layers |
. |
108 |
_ |
|
Improved layers |
- |
237 |
- |
|
Beef and veal |
11.9 |
103 |
203 |
|
|
6.7 |
138 |
137 |
|
Mutton and lamb |
2.0 |
12 |
15 |
|
Goat meat |
3.9 |
10 |
12 |
|
Pig meat |
8.0 |
35 |
76 |
|
Poultry meat |
9.6 |
- |
- |
*average for
cattle
There are many
areas of concern that constrain realisation of full
potential of this sector. The structure of population is one such issue.
Despite significant advances in livestock breeding, the population structure
continues to be dominated by local breeds. According to the 1992 Livestock
Census, crossbred comprise only 7.5, 4.8 and 14.5 percent of cattle, sheep and
pig populations respectively (Table 2). Only one-third of the poultry
population represents improved breeds.
Table 2 :
Species-wise percentage of crossbred in total population,
1992
|
|
Rural |
Urban |
India |
|
Cattle |
7.0 |
20.2 |
7.4 |
|
Sheep |
4.7 |
7.0 |
4.8 |
|
Pig |
14.2 |
16.4 |
14.5 |
|
Poultry |
31.8 |
44.2 |
32.7 |
Second issue
relates to the organisation of production system. In
general the system of production is extensive in nature. Though technological
dualism persists (Table 2). The system of dairying in and around the urban
areas is based on improved breeds and intensive input use. While the rural
system of production is characterised by low input
and low technology. It is apprehended that technological change and commercialisation will further accentuate this divide. Meat
production is constrained by lack of productivity augmenting technologies and
socio-religious taboos. Breeding efforts are yet to capitalise
on the genetic stock of the indigenous breeds. The yawning gap between the
existing slaughter rates and potential off-take for certain species merits urgent
attention. Premature slaughtering of animals for meat is a national waste.
Fig 2.
Trend in wholesale prices

A case in point is that of goat and buffalo improvements in
poultry breeds must concentrate on increasing feed efficiency and tropical
adaptation. Non-compliance of phyto-sanitary and
quality standards in exports of livestock products is another grey area.
Ineffective quarantine regime leads to importation of contaminated biologicals and infected livestock species.
Reorientation
of research priorities is the need of the hour. In the past, research efforts
have been cattle - centred. This has yielded some
results, but at the cost of other promising livestock species like the buffalo,
sheep and goats. Henceforth, livestock research needs to internalise
certain crucial technical parameters. Regarding cattle, a shift in direction is
required. The emphasis must be on ecological adaptability and disease
resistance of crossbred species. Buffalo holds the promise of raising milk
production. Its feed conversion efficiency is remarkable and a breakthrough in
buffalo breeding will provide a big push to the livestock economy. Small
ruminant meat production is likely to come under pressure unless there is a
breakthrough in the genetics of sheep and goat. Genetic evaluation 75-80
percent of goats is yet to be attempted. Therefore, buffalo and small ruminants
deserve a greater share in research resources. Research focussing
on heat stress in various agro-ecological regions warrants priority.
Simultaneously, crop improvement efforts must focus on the forage quality
aspects. A farming system perspective needs to be adopted across the board.
Research paradigm must be client oriented. Future research agenda therefore,
should have an explicit focus on these issues.
Till 90s the
policy thrust in this sector was rather moderate. In 1991, dairy sector was delicensed in order to attract private investment and new
technologies. The policy remains restrictive in the sense that the new entrants
are required to develop new milksheds. Restriction on
processing of milk into high value products during lean season of production
also acts as a disincentive for private investment Box-l).
|
The co-operative sector is a major player in the organised marketing of milk and its products. In 1991,
dairying processing was delicensed with the
objective of promoting competition and augmenting technology. This resulted
in weakening of the cooperative sector by the onslaught of new entrants. In
order to contain this problem, the Milk and Milk Products Order was
promulgated in 1992. The MMPO is an example of the policy dilemma that
government faces. The intention of promoting viable and vibrant co-operative
is a national priority. However, blanket protection to the entire sector may
encourage inefficiency in the guise of national interests. Therefore, there
is room for reforming the MMPO by rendering it more flexible. |
Such
restrictions curb competition and market efficiency, which are essential for
stimulating investment in productivity-augmenting technologies both at macro
and micro levels. The onset of economic reforms programme
helped boost exports of livestock products. Buffalo meat export recorded
substantial increase in recent years mainly because of its price
competitiveness (Box 2). The scope for exports of sheep, goat and poultry meat
is constrained by high domestic demand and prices.
|
Box 2 : WTO : Latent Opportunity On the-export front, India has a
competitive advantage in the world market for many livestock products.
However, its share in world trade continues to be meagre.
Dairy products export has not been encouraging in the past due to high
domestic demand and lack of competitiveness in the world market. With the
reduction in subsidies under WTO agreement by the European countries, India's
export of dairy products is likely to expand on account of price competitiveness.
By 2000 AD member states of the WTO have to reduce export subsides and
volumes of export by 36 and 21 percent respectively. |
Health,
nutrition and extension support merits special consideration in the process of
technological transformation of livestock sector. The current extension system
is largely crop oriented. Based on a SWOT analysis of the extension system for
crop production, a flexible system for livestock should be evolved. This may
involve many actors viz government, private
processing industries and non-governmental organisations.
In the area of health, smaller animals need greater attention, and so would an
appropriate institutional framework. Technological change must be accompanied
by policies aimed at population optimisation and
enhanced feed fodder supply. In rural areas the potential benefits of
technological change are likely to be greater for medium and large farmers 'due
to skewed distribution of land, a crucial determinant of size of livestock
holding. Strong measures in the form of institutional arrangements and policy
intervention would be needed to counter these tendencies.
The private
sector is playing a pro-active role in the marketing of livestock products. It
has a vital role in strengthening forward linkages and value-addition
particularly in areas that have remained neglected. There are however, some
constraints that hinder their entry. The much-needed interface between public
and private sector is sadly missing. Increasingly, in the years to come,
initiatives will be private sector-led (Box 3). The government must restrict
its role to providing policy impetus, infrastructure and monitoring. The
National Livestock Policy Perspective document details the necessary policy
changes required for the livestock sector in the next millennium. Certain
critical issues can strengthen this major' effort. Explicit focus on
agro-climatic and location specific breeding, tightening the quarantine regime,
stepping up research investment, arresting the degradation of CPRs, conservation of animal germplasm,
processing and market intelligence will yield rich dividends.
|
Box 3 : Wish- list of the private
sector The following interventions would
provide stimulus to private sector participation in production and processing
of livestock products: (1) Easing import restrictions on feed like corn
(particularly to the traders). (2) Compulsory backward integration for
slaughterhouses particularly for male buffalo calves. (3) Provision of decent
marketing infrastructure mainly network of cold storage facilities. (4)
Incentives for mechanisation of slaughterhouses.
(5) Effective disease surveillance mechanisms and establishment of disease
free zones for export marketing. (6) Establishment of standards and grading
for livestock products. (7) Strengthen interface between public sector and
private sector. (8) Access to cheap institutional credit. (9) Import duty
reduction for feed additives (10) Promote stall-feeding of small ruminants. |
|
March, 1999 |
Ravishankar A. |
|
NCAP
has been established by the Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR)
with a view to upgrading agricultural economics research through integration
of economics input in planning. designing, and evaluation of agricultural
research programmes and for strengthening the
competence in agricultural policy analysis within the Council. NCAP
Policy Briefs are intended to contribute to the debates on important
agricultural policy issues. Opinions expressed are that of the author and do
not necessarily reflect the views of the Centre. |